Charles E W Bean, Diaries, AWM38 3DRL 606/40/1 - February - March 1916 - Part 3

19
2
fellows pretty closely for
18 months now. And at /
end of it I shdn't like to
say whether / New Zealand
discipline ws better or /
Australian. That is to say-
if you give them an order - which
wd be / best to carry it out.
I don't know th it wd be /
New Zealander!”
And I know what he
means. Put three men - a
British Tommy, a N. Zealander
& an Australian all to carry
out, say, a difficult piece of
tiresome sapping at Anzac,
or give them a night attack
& tell them tt they are only to
 

20
2
use / bayonet, not to fire
& not to cheer or tell
them they are to collect & burn
all rubbish & not throw it in
an insanitary manner down
/ main gully; or tt they
mustn’t empty their
waterbottles before night fall
- & wh o / three will
obey you to / letter. I don't
know - I too have seen them
through / whole o / time at
Anzac, & I shdn’t like
to answer tt question; but
if I did I would almost
be inclined to back /
Australian. And if we
who have watched them
closely x and critically for
 

21
2
all this time cdn’t give
you a definite opinion
upon tt poin, how can this
British staff, wh has never
seen / men at all except
in / streets of Cairo & Ismailia,
give you one?
The British off
Shortly after I got here I
called on White & he asked me to
dine with Gen. Godley & himself
Godley was then commanding
1st Anzac - Birdwood commanding
nothing in particular & White
C. of Staff to Godley. At tt dinner 
- no it ws a lunch - in their
fine H.Q. (rather like the H.Qs in
rich woolbrokers houses aroum
Lille) the question of Hamilton
 

We work an to
22
2
arose. Godley was very indignant 
with Murdoch for the strictures
& criticisms made by him in
his letter to Fisher (which became
a British cabinet paper , & of
which they heard at Anzac before
the exacuation tho’ I didn’t 
know it).
“Well”, sd Godley, I always
thought Hamilton must have
bn a strong man did a very
strong thing when he decided came to the decision
tt we were to stay at
Anzac.”
“That was Thursby’s
decision, Sir “ said Brig.-Gen.
Carruthers who was there- 
“I remember when he saw
 

23
2
tt / landing had made
some headway at Anzac
he was very much impressed
with the importance of pushing 
in there - bringing the
troops round from Helles
to it - & so was I. He couldn't
put it before Hamelton himself
but he put it strongly
before the Admiral - they
didn't do it though.”
“Well, I may be wrong”, wd 
White, “but I think still tt / advice opinion
I gave Gen. Bridge then, when,
he asked me, was right-
that the right thing to do ws
to withdraw the troops from
Anzac. We knew noting
about / Helles landing but
 

24
2
we knew the Anzac landing
had failed - & as it had not
succeeded the right thing was
to get out of it & use / troops
where they could be effective”.
(This was quite a
new view to me, but I
daresay it really is the
right one - Thinking it over
in fact it is) one becomes
rather persuaded tt it really
ws I right thing).
But if I remember right 
Thursby said they cdnt have
got the ships up in time
to do it,” said xx Godley
or Carruthers.
“Oh yes they could- 
 

25
2
I know they sd they cdn’t
but if we’d twisted their
tails they ad have done it” 
sd White.
“I always take it,” I wd,
tt Hamilton's real failure
was in not making up his
mind after May 8th tt
it ws impossible to get
from ^Helles by taking by Achi Baba-
& for not then & there
trying some other way”_
“I can see as clearly
as day why Braithwaite
wouldn't do that, “ White
sd- I know exactly what
he’d say to himself. He'd
say: ‘Any plan is better
 

26
2
than a changing of plans’-
‘when you’ve made up your
mind to do a thing tt
way - go on doing it
tt way even if it’s a bad
way’. They had made up
their minds to make the
great push by Helles-
we knew tt before landing-
& I’m sure Braithwaite wdn’t
depart from it.”
- and I expect tt is 
/ explanation of a good deal
tt has puzzled me too. Most
people put down Braithwaites
persistence to sheer jealousy,
 

27
2
There is jealousy in / Army
too. When I used to read of
generals being in / same country’s
army being so jealous of one
another to they cd scarcely
act together I used to
doubt whether such things
weren’t/ imaginatn of
historians. At any rate, if 
one believed that such a state
of afairs existed in France in
1870 it never entered ones
head tt it cd possibly 
Exist in / British service.
But here in Egypt we
have been witnessing what
the army calls the Battle of
the Ms - Murray versus
Maxwell: and now
 

28
2
Murray has signally won
& Maxwell goes off to England
defeated withen a few days.
It is really only a side
fight of the much larger
fight of Robertson vs Kitchener.
Maxwell is a “Kitchener
man” T Murray is a
“Robertson man” - & now
that Robertson has defeated
Kitchener and go the
Kitchener men along with
K. I doresy its better
for / country tt Robertson
should conduct / war
rather than Kitchener.
Kitchener was rather acting
as a commander-in-Chief