Charles E W Bean, Diaries, AWM38 3DRL 606/38B/1 - Notebook - Part 3

Conflict:
First World War, 1914–18
Subject:
  • Documents and letters
Status:
Open for review
Accession number:
RCDIG1066740
Difficulty:
5

Page 1 / 10

Intro. 19 would be Armageddon, a huge racial was at the very least. As a matter of officially fact, athough it was denied by Jermany at the time, the fermand goot had seen the Austrian ultimation before it had been despatched. What motive prompted the ferman a single goot in repaing to stop the war, when shat exprcision of its opinion wow sholt hint hent to the Austrian goot wd have sufficed, may Soneday be known. Probably the Kaiser Wilhelm II was deeply shocked by the ss marder of his personal friend & inewhat medicival code demanded that Austria should be quite unhendered in inflicting what form of retribution she chose upon those whoin he assumed to be responsible for the assaccization of a prince; probably a section of the german general staff was ready for was & anxious to seize what looked (for making iti like a favourable opportunity certainly most of the members of the Govt & the bulk of the Prussian people had been gradually imbued with the idea for which someofe for which a peculiar school of Prussian philosophy in Prusasan history & the great figure of Bismarck are tayih
Intro 20 responsible - the idea that the only their to be respected in this world is might & strength. & rigour; & that the Prassian ideal must be to infosit mighty will upon an allpogerful become nation & impose its mighty will upon others & so give place & enlightenment to the world. That idea was so entirely opposed to the Britih idea that each man & each nation should be left to work out its own desting in its own way, that trouble was quite certain to come of it some dayit wsprotabl thi cla of ideasthe clasbetween the systems that had been built upon them, was probably the theP direct cause of the war. Because the Prossions held their ideas they had educated + produced a military class which had been allowed to turn the nation into a hage armed camp - one next war ogeidial machine of which the first was success in war. British ideas had turned out a class of freethinking citizens who dispised + detested this military despotion atmost as cordiall as the military despotion hated them, the military despotiom which
21 Intro. really rahd germany – quite apart from the Kaiser - naturally saw no reason to prevent Ferman Austria from going to war. And the nation was with it. Hustica declared war on Servia. Rassia mobilised her troops along the Austrian & ferman frontier. M Germany declared war on Russia; &, as France was bound by alleance to help Russia, + was clearly preparing to helpher, upon France - too. Even at this stage it a very Britain would have foinedi openion was doubtful if faver of way the war if t genangs action ttthe scopeof the war had stopped there. It is true that Britain The question at this stage was whether Britains understanding with France bound her in honour or in seff defince to kelp France in the war. The policy on which the British Govt relied for the defence of the Emprie was the same on which Britain had fairly consistently relied for several centuries -t allow an to tme bee oit into the rale never to allow any one power or combination of powers to become & strong as
Intro 22 to have the fortunes of Britain in the hollow of its hand. So long as there was more or leas equality amongst the great nations of the world they would be bound to respect one another & the result would be international justice - or as near as nations have yet approached to it. Balgi perefory adyaye autnafienlly frrw terlf pute the sfe on the wraty torh op farfalogg feaded to choils itall Aghat soncon of When the European powers divided themselves - as they naturally tended to - into two sides for mutual defence, Britain by this policy automatically threw herself into the scale on the weaker side in order to equalice it & if possible just turn it against the stronger. The policy is bold one & has e been justified by success. But it automatically trew Britain always fair across the pak of the t any power that was outstandingly strong - not for the sake of the quarrel but for the take of preventing that power from becomin stronger. tpou drom the point of view of the strongest power i tooked as if Exlland appeased to be
23 Intro whilst other powers intered quarrels for the tn appeared to enter it purely sake oft for the take of opposing them; & a it i always found that whilst they were inclined to be generous with their other enemies, that botter Britain always received their Etn t ti that bitterest enmity. te statesmen understood Britains policy perfectly, but the mass of foreign peoples, across whose pat Brit policy led her, alwayseetha persuaded timselves that Britain had enginiered the trouble against them; that she was too cowardly to fight for herself depended on dragging in other nations to fight for her whilst she sat by & received the profits of the war. Rixc Butin hd aot alweys Sais amo held to this This policg need It is needless to day that tie This was the famous traditional British policy of maintaining the balance of power. English foreign ministers had on the whole consistint athered to it, & Sir Edward Grey, the forcigi minister of Britain at this time, formity
Intro. 24 believed in it. There cxisted in Earope, at the Germany time, one nation which was being definitely educated by a national school of philosophy to beieve tet to the belief that its duty was to establish a Regemony" - a leadership - amongst the nations. nd t tobe the old policy seemed to be be particularly fin leequirally the safest defena under the circumstances. sel coverning The dominions of the Empire were fast prowing in strength; but weret yet stayg although they were wealthy and were beginning to ome defence develop Xarmies F (in the case of Australia a navy, they were not strong enough to enable great Britain to counterbalance the strongest power in the world without seeking allies outside the British Empere. The division at this time in Europe was between Germany Hustria & Italy (the Triple alliance) on the one Land & France ? of ie Russia (the Dual alliance) on the other powers Germany was the stronger & France he weakers & Sir edward grey, following the policy of King Edward III, threw the weight of
25 Intro. Britain into the scale on the side of France, understanding Te aranee meby er dbetween England & France was one of those curiously indefiniteun relations which rather appeal to the Anglo Savon people. On the big question of mutual help in case of attack no wretten agreement existed at all. These actually existed nothing that could be called an arrangement? But unquestionably, without any writing at all, there grew ap an understanding that, in guat its friend were such as any trouble, provided the cause ofthe its people approved of, Britain would help France & France Britain. Volumes have been written & spoken to prove that there was or that there was not an obligation. At the clear trut in that whatever has been said or written, the cear trut is that an obligation did exist because an understanding existed - an indefinite one but neverthiless an unquestionable understanding that ieither nation were involved in a war with more powerful nations in the other group, & its cause were such as to appeal
26 Intro to the justice of its friend, it night expect its friend to help it. On the strength of this understanding, so far as I know without a single written word, the naval defence of the Meditinianian was lef to France + that of the North Sea to Britain. France withdrew pratically all her ships from the North Sea, & Britain cutdown the size of her squadson in the meditur amean The British was office discussed with the French war ofice the nature of the help that might be fiven to France if ever the two countries were forced to defend themselves together. And a British staf officer discussed with the Belgian staf in Brussels the arrangements which coming to the help o Belguim by could be made forn ssant landing a itiforce in case germany ever broke Belgian nentrality + crossed the Belgean portier. The notis of this interview were aferwards discovered by the Germans in Brussels & were published by them as a proof that Britain had contemplated breaking the nentrality of Belgium which must have deliberate been known to be aperversion of the facts,
Intro 27 When fermany declared was upon Fance, therefore, the question at once arose whether tonour to Britain was board to support France - in this war. There, was 8 quite defined I were several strongcuncuts opinion in Britain & Australia; although owing to the saddenness of the changes on the sittation they had very little time to reach the air, the newspapers of the few days preseding the war, stand there as evidece of them. The opinion of the few who like Sir Edward Grey believed that as a matter defince pouy & oritain mast precent France from being of sheer from crushed wasxutterly swamped & lost sight of in the hage I rivers of public opinion which ran inher channels The two man streams were one which thought that Britain was bound by the "entente" to support France; & one almost, if not quite, as powerful which morally held that nothing had happined which oblig England to enter the war. The one reason why England had never entered into a written agreement was in order that She should preserve her liberty to judge in
suit make 28 Intro every case whether the quarret was such as she could enter into. And there was a considerable undercurrent of British feeling that altough fermany could have avoided the war by a high to Austria, Russia could have avoided it also by confining her mobilisation to hose of her troops who were on the Austrian portier. When war with Austria became imminent Russia ordered a nobilisation of her army which included emobilisation of at least some of the Russian troops on the ferman fronties. feangth tat of feeling in Jenary & kit the geane also derin mobilisation" is an indefinite term which is always twisted by both sides to their own purpose before the outbreak of war. It is only a prudent precaution if war seems imminent, to recall officers to their regiments, make sure that military stores are in readmess + wel &the preparations inh case of necessity. These preparations are obvious to the other side, &arofe spoker of as mobilication although it is not known how far they go - that being

19

Intro

might would be Armageddon, or a huge racial

war at the very least. As a matter of

fact, although it was ^officially denied by Germany

at the time, the Germans Govt had seen

the Austrian ultimatum before it had been

despatched. What motive prompted the German

Govt in refusing to stop the war, when one a single

short expression of its opinion wou short hint

hint to the Austrian Govt wd have sufficed, may

someday be known Probably the Kaiser

Wilhelm ll was deeply shocked by the crue

murder of his personal friend & impress his somewhat

mediaeval code demanded that Austria should

be quite unhindered in obtain inflicting 

what form of retribution she chose upon those

whom he assumed to be responsible for the

murder ^assassination of a prince; probably a section

of the German general staff was ready

& eager for was & anxious to seize what looked

like a favourable opportunity ^for making it, impr certainly

most of the members of the Govt & the

bulk of the Prussian people had been

gradually imbued with that idea that

x for which some of the for which a

peculiar school of Prussian philosophy

& the great figure of Bismarck ^in Prussian history are largely

 

20

Intro

responsible - the idea that the only thing to

be respected in this world is might & strength

& rigour; & that the Prussian ideal must

be to impose its mighty will upon

become a mighty ^an all-powerful nation & impose its

mighty will upon others & so give

peace & enlightenment to the world. T

That idea was so entirely opposed to the 

British idea that each man & each

nation should be left to work out its

own destiny in its own way, that

trouble was quite certain to come of it

some day - & it was probably the

this clash of ideas & the clash between

the system that had been built upon there,

the Prus was probably the

direct cause of the war.  Because the
Prussians held their ideas they had educated

& produced a military class which had

xxx been allowed to turn the nation into

a huge armed camp - one great war

machine of which the first object ^object  ideal was success

in war. The British ideas had turned out

a class of free thinking citizens who despised

& detested this military despotism almost as

cordially as the military despotism hated

them. Nationally The military despotism which

 

21

Intro

really ruled Germany - quite apart from the

Kaiser - naturally saw no reason to prevent

Austria from going to war. And the ^German nation was

with it. Austria declared war on Servia.

Russia mobilised her troops along the Austrian 

& German frontier. Then Germany declared 

war on Russia; &,  as France was clearly

bound by alliance to help Russia, & was

clearly preparing to help her, upon

France too.

Even at this stage it is very

doubtful if English opinion was more in Britain would have joined in 
favour of war  the war if xxx Germany's action

had stopped the scope of the war had

stopped there. It is true that Britain

The question at this stage was whether xx

bond of Britains understanding with France

bound her in honour or in self defence to help

France in the war. The British policy on which

the British Govt relied for the defence of the

Empire was the same on which Britain had

successfully relied fairly consistently relied

for several centuries - never to allow

any to throw her waist into the scale

against never to allow any one power or

combination of powers to become so strong as

 

22

Intro

to have the fortunes of Britain in the hollow of

its hand. So long as there was more or less

equality amongst the great nations of the world

they would be bound to respect one another &

the result would be international justice - or as

near as nations have yet approached to it.

Britain therefore always automatically threw

herself into the scale on the weaker side

Europe has always tended to divide itself

A great division of When the European 

powers divided themselves - as they naturally

tended to - into two part sides for mutual

defence, Britain by this policy automatically

threw herself into the scale on the weaker 

side in order to equalise it & if possible

just turn it against the stronger. The 

policy is a very bold one & has succeeded

beyond been justified by success. But

it automatically threw Britain in the

always fair across the path of the strongest

power in any power that was outstandingly

strong - not for the sake of the quarrel but

for the sake of preventing that power from winning

Th becoming stronger. The strongest power

From the point of view of the strongest power

it looked as if England appeared to be

 

23
Intro

whilst other powers quarre entered quarrels for the

sake of the quarre only a cause Britain appeared to enter it purely

 for the sake of opposing them; & x it x was always

found that whilst they were inclined to be

generous with their other enemies their bitterest

hatred always Britain always received their

bitterest enmity. It seemed to them that

Britain The European statesmen understood Britains

policy perfectly; but the mass of foreign 

peoples across whose path Britain that policy

led her, always believed that Britain

was persuaded themselves that Britain

had engineered the what trouble against

them; that she was to cowardly to fight

for herself & always depended on dragging

in other nations to fight for her whilst she

sat by & received the profits of the war

this Sir Edward Britain had not always

xxxxxxxx held to this p

This policy, need

It is needless to say that this

This was the famous traditional British policy of

maintaining the "balance of power." English 

foreign minsters had on the whole been consistently

adhered to it, & Sir Edward Grey, the foreign

minster of Britain at this time, firmly

 

24

Intro

believed in it. There existed in Europe, at the

time, one nation ^Germany which was being definitely

educated by a national school of philosophy

to believe xxxx its "destiny" to the belief

that its duty was to lead establish a

"hegemony" - a leadership - amongst

the nations. And the only safety seemed

to be x xxx The old policy seemed to be

be particularly jsut be especially the safest

defence under the circumstance. Britain

The overseas self governing dominions of the Empire were

fast growing in strength; but were not 

yet strong enough although they were 

wealthy their and were beginning to

develop ^"home defence"armies & (in the case of Australia)

a navy, they were not strong enough 

to enable Great Britain to counter balance

the strongest power in the world without

seeking allies allies outside the British

Empire. The strong The division at

this time in Europe was between

Germany Austria & Italy (the Triple

Alliance) on the one Land & France &

Russia (the Dual Alliance) on the other. The Of these

powers Germany was the stronger & France the weaker & Sir

Edward Grey, following The policy of 

King Edward Vll , threw the weight of

 

25
Intro.

Britain into scale on the side of France.

The arrangement understanding made by Sir

Edward fo between England & France was

one of those curiously indefinite understandings

relations which rather appeal to the Anglo Saxon

people. On the big question of mutual help

in case of attack no written agreement

existed at all. There actually existed nothing

that could be called an "arrangement."

But unquestionably, without any writing at

all, there grew up an understanding that, in

any ^great trouble, provided the cause of the other com its friend were such 

as its people approved of, Britain would

help France & France Britain. Volumes

have been written & spoken to prove that

there was or that there was not an

obligation. but The clear truth is that

Whatever has been said or written, the 

clear truth is that an obligation

did exist because an understanding

existed - an indefinite one may but

nevertheless an unquestionable

understanding that if either nation

were involved in a war with other

xx more powerful nations in the other

group, & its cause were such as to appear

 

26

Intro.

to the justice of its friend, it might expect

its friend to help it. xx On the strength of

this understanding, so far as I know without

a single written word, the naval defence

of the Mediterranean was left to France &

that of the North Sea to Britain. France

withdrew practically all her ships from

the North Sea, & Britain cut down the

size of her squadron in the Mediterranean.

The British xxx War Office discussed with

the French War Office the nature of the help

that might be given to France if ever the

two countries found were forced to defend

themselves together. And a British

staff officer discussed with the Belgium

staff in Brussels the arrangement which

could be made for landing a British coming to the help of Belgium by

landing a British force in Belgium there in case Germany ever 

broke Belgian neutrality & crossed the

Belgian frontier. There The notes of this

interview were afterwards discovered

by the Germans in Brussels & were

published by them as a proof that Britain

had contemplated breaking the neutrality

of Belgium- when a version which must have

been known to be a ^deliberate perversion of the facts.

 

27

Intro.

When Germany declared war upon France,

therefore, the question at once arose whether

Britain was bound xx ^in honour to support France xx

in this war. There was a xxxxxxxxxxxxx

opinion were several strong ^& quite definite currents of

opinion which were quite definite in Britain
& Australia; which although owing to the

suddenness of the change in the situation they

had very little time to reach the air, the newspapers

of the few days preceding the war stand there

as evidence of them. The opinion of the few

who like Sir Edward Grey believed that as a matter

of sheer ^defence policy Britain must prevent France from being

crushed was^ from the first alone utterly swamped & lost

sight of in the huge rivers of public

opinion which ran in other xxxx channels.

The two main streams were one which

thought that Britain was bound by the

"Entente" to support France; & one which

almost, if not quite, as powerful which

held that nothing had ^yet happened which ^morally obliged

England to enter the war. The one reason

why England had preserv never entered into

written agreement was in order that

she should preserve her liberty to judge in

 

28

Intro

every case whether the quarrel was such

as she could enter into. And there was

still a considerable undercurrent of British

feeling that although Germany could have

avoided the war by a hint to Austria, Russia

could have done avoided it also by

confining her mobilisation to those of her

troops who were on the Austrian frontier.

When war with Austria became imminent

xxxxxxx Russia ordered a mobilisation

of her army which included xxx the mobilisation

of at least some of the Russian troops on

the German frontier. Seeing the state of

feeling in Germany & that the Germans also

were in "Mobilisation" is an indefinite

term which is always twisted by both sides to

suit their own purpose before the outbreak

of war. It is only a prudent precaution,

if war seems imminent, to recall officers

to their regiments, xxx xxxx make sure

that military stores are in readiness &

make similar & these preparations are

obvious to the other side, & are often

spoken of as mobilisation although the

it is not known how far they go - that being

 

 

 

 

 

 

Last edited by:
Helen MartinHelen Martin
Last edited on:

Last updated: