Charles E W Bean, Diaries, AWM38 3DRL 606/254/1 - 1917 - 1933 - Part 22

Conflict:
First World War, 1914–18
Subject:
  • Documents and letters
Status:
Awaiting approval
Accession number:
RCDIG1066691
Difficulty:
2

Page 1 / 10

Dri 7 189 - Stanåd. 2 Du. GEi A. 33. Glggon Wd. 6 Zri T 4 8 75 Brvodande 2Du 3Du 2 Dr goo Fak aled 3Durs 12Det 928 D 2i. 725 Tefig Oel gas. sNyee. 932 Hor. 25Vn gas 7-22 dug ' Nar. Rrtg - gas 3o s u 45 314 So o 25 12 4o 36 24 42 63 17 12 32 25 ! 33 2it 6o 13 to 97: 976 833 186 977 328 Ga6 5s 27 se! (98 259 1o3 o 116 329 23 872 934 289 229 254 905 820 103 889 855 (486 395 200 97 1.322 os Sl 186 978 14 116 202 (31 23228
48 2ag 4214 28 94 1410- 152 3710 22. 3383 284 53924 92 o4 18 38,452 ork
TELEPHONE: TEENTAAL 4780. o COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE, MELBOURNE, Ist December 1932 Dear John, The figures asked for in yours of the 29th ult. are appended. I have not prepared any additional figures for Corps troops, as they were included in those supplied on the 21st ult. I made one important typographical error in the figures, for officers wounded in the lst Division,sent, on the 21st please amend to read 233 in place of 133. Yours sincerely, O 6 llhg J. Balfour Esq. Victoria Barracks, Paddington. N.S.W.
IN THE FIVE AUSTRALIAN DIVISIONS DURING THE PERIODS SPECIFIED TOTAL A.I.F. BATTIE CASUALTIES TOTAL Kll1a0 D.of G.P. D.O.N. 4./.A. Off. G.R. Ofi. O.R. of. O.3. 0ff 141 220e 7670 12 Nov.1917 ist Aust.Div.(20 July a5 114 2137 166 2nd Aust.Div.(20 July to 21 Nov.191 3rd Aust. Div. (15 Sept.to 20 Oct.1917 1541 1258 276 1344 296 25 Oct.1917 10 4th Aust. Div. (15 Sept. to 74 1600 12 Nov.1917) -57 1243 35 5th Aust.Div. (19 July to TOTAL OTHER GRAND TOTAL ."V" THAN B.TIII Gieuhinigs Hluup P.of V. Gassed (Shoc Founded OFF. OTHER RanKS O.8. off. 55. 5.H. 0ff. O.F. off. O.N. Off. iR. 507 235 3777 200 642 249 ist Aust. Div. 6097 8234 243 35 889 2nd Aust. Div. 224 5760 4219 209 3rd Aust. Div. 4933 i a 4th Aust. Div. 230 4738 6338 16 156 22 3934 208 580 13 5th Aust. Div. 33386 ) 34777 Extracted from statistics compiled by Australian Section, 3rd Echelon, B.E.F. from Field Returns and Hospital Reports. Ist December 1932 O
29 November 1932. A.J. WTHERS, Esq., Defence Department, Melbourne. Dear Withers, Many thanks for the details of casualties enclosed with your letter of 21st November. Dr Bean would now like to obtain if available, particulars, as under, for periods specified: O.R. Off. Otal Battle Casualties A. ist Aust. Div.(20 Jult to 12 Nov. 1917 2nd Aust. Div. (20 July to 21 Nov. 1917 ...... .... 3rd Aust. Div. (15 Sept to 20 Oct. 191 ...... ... 4th Aust. Div. (15 Sept to 25 Oct. 191 ........ .... ........ 5th Aust. Div. (19 July to 12 Nov. 1917) Yours sincerely,
TELEPHONE: -CENTEAL 4780. COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE, MELBOURNE, 21st November 1932 Dear John, I am enclosing a statement of A.I.F. casualties during the period 31st July - 15th November 1917 (inclusive). As you omitted to state whether you required Non-battle casualties as well as Battle casualties I have prepared figures of the totals by cause and have left you to make the additions suitable to your requirements. Yours sincerely, O Gutberg J. Balfour Esq., Victoria Barracks, Padding ton. N.S.F.
(23 A.I.F. CASUALTIES II FRANCI 31ST JULY TO 15TH NOVEMEER 19t2 (INEUSIVE) D.O.W. K.1.4. D.of G.P. Acc.Killed D.Of Off. On. Off. O.R. Off. O.R. Off. O.R. Off. 6.3. 103: 1669 30- 4977 144 lst Division -. 1650: 445: 894 24: 2nd 15 72: 14221 -4 194 3rd 393653 11 4th 44d 12051 141 101 389. 174 5th 57: 123. 352 6: 14314 L.of C.& Corps 76- 43 465 90 Troope 31 13288 700 713 102 36 S/Shock"W" Wounded Gas S.I.w. Acc. Wd. P.oi Sich Off. O.. Off. O.R. Off. O.3. Off. O.R. 5.R. Off. O... Off. Off..0.R. 29 lst Division 891 51195 620. 88133 27 88 4085 201 24 28 2100 87: 5070- 2nd 856- 17 10 68, 4456 13d 1497 45461 72d 246- 10? 3nd 23. 1 12 4282 3494 4th 1427 3826- 561 10 294 4014 580- 5th 25 1318 39074 206- 141 210 90 4129 344 21d L.of C. & Corps 431 6775 -0 i 70 135 3048 Troops 308 231445 12 7115 ug 713 126 208 5 Extracted from statistics compiled 3rd Echelen from Field Returns and Hospital Reports. O5 21st November 1932 oss 3 5 A O4 a" 5"oo to 83) ce. i ee
2 18 November 1932. A.J. Withers, Esq. Defence Department Helbourn Dear Withers, When I was in Melbourne, I think you told me that you can readily put your hand on detailed figures of If so, Dr Bean would liko to obtain A.I.F. casualties. the following - 15 Nov., 1917 (inclus Jul in rance. R.1.F. Casualtls! ive) Orfibers Zodul, zzts ist Australian Division Zou . No0 2nd A ... 3rd Seet(S Ræ- 200ct4 Ath 2223.25 sar 5th ro. ..... ..... Other A.I.F. units in France 9de ear If the figures are not available for this precise period, perhaps you could obtain the totals for the months August- But, if this request involves a Novomber inclusive. great deal of research, do not go ahead with it; we may be ablo to find another way of indicating in the volume the point which Dr Bean wishes to bring out. Yours sincerely,
5 845 Bar 4 Witt regandto (Ko fascaanallte an he attachad Ketters, would gor be 20 f0od aoto tat me hao Ahattar anong Kore lted unr to (asgonded en Keferstone Aeeond Rebar, Hüre were augg fatal ased( It so Gould joe lat we Anoud Ke tolal daatte (in the serond lisk): Htnaare) Ract 16133 s Dan B Ihare ssert no deutle pam das Bisoninge un she ing Bengadeg om ohe Brr Bad deing . of eouer iftas fearlle that somt ultinedilg deret
THE AUSTRALIANS AT RABAUL IDec,I944 170 It appears strange that at this stage, and without reference to or consultation with Holmes, Pethebridge should have made recommendations relative to matters which, it might have been assumed, fell solely within the jurisdichion of the Adminis¬ Trator of New Guinen. Especiallv is this remarkable in viey of the original instructions given to him that Min carrying out your mussion the Government do not desire you to take any achion wich regard to any matters afecting the possessions south of the equator, with which the Admunsstrator at Rabaul has already dealt. Pethebridge apparently took the view that these instruchions had been cancelled by the abandonment of the North-Vest Pacife Expedition, and that, in his capacity as Secretary for Defence, he now had a general authority to make recommendations to the Minister, wih whom his relations had naturally been most intimate and confdential. In this he may have been right. It must, however, be frankly admitted that in his reports to Melbourne (both on this Gccasion and, later, on that of his frst arrival at Rabaul) he evinced a tendency to enubark upon hasty and rather sweeping criticism of the structure of the military administration adopted by Hlolnes. Yet it was the saneistructure which he himself subsequently retained, witch lttle modifcaton. (Vich the knowledge he afterwards acquired of conditions in New Guinea, he would have strenuously opposed the partition of the Territory into two independent admunistrative spheres, which would, in fact, have been a serious muistake, retarding the growth and destroying the cohesion of the admuinistration. In his report to Melbourne from Madang Pethebridge also stated that most of the troops forming the garrison there, as well as Bracegirdle's men who had been sent from Rabaul for the Sepik River expedition, were discontented and anxious to return to Australa as were also, he was informed, the remainder of Holmess force. As the islands north of the equator were now beyond Australian jurisdiction, he said he would proceed to Rabaul, taking back with him the greater part of Bracegirdles contingent, and would then report more defnitely how to utilise the Eastern troops. It would,he continued, be necessary to relieve the garrison at Nauru. On his return from Nauru the members of the Tropical Force it

 

p. 789 - Menin Rd. 1st Div

30

614

   

45

996

   

44

833

   

6

186

  2 Div.

45

979

   

11

328

   

34

696

   

11

155

   

2

27

p 831 Polygon Wd 4 Div

30

281

   

10

198

   

25

604

   

12

259

  5 Div

35

1.031

   

40

1.061

   

36

1167

   

24

329

   

3

23

p 875 Broodseinde 1 Div

42

872

   

53

934

   

17

289

   

12

229

  2 Div

9

254

   

37

905

   

38

820

   

8

103

  3 Div

25

889

   

41

855

900 Panch 9 Oct. 2 Div

33

486

   

24

395

   

7

200

   

11

97

928     "          12 Oct. 3 Div

60

1,322

   

41

1045

   

13

524

   

8

186

  4 Div

40

978

935                 26 Oct, 1 Div

7

147

932        16/19 Oct gas    1 Anzac.

 

116

933                  Nov 25 Prn gas

6

202

               July|Nov. Arty -gas  

 

1313

   

975

23,228

 

 

AIF Book

 

39

   
 

712

  July
 

2

   
 

48

 
 

113

   

2478

  Aug
 

23

   
 

421

 
 

1

   
 

10

   
 

68

  Sept

1410

 
 

152

   
 

3110

  Oct
 

4

   
 

22

 
 

335

   

9367

  Nov
 

284

   
 

5397

 
 

2

   
 

92

   
 

550

  Dec
 

13811

   
 

38,452

   

 

 

TELEPHONE:
CENTRAL 4780.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE,
MELBOURNE, 1st December 1932
Dear John,
The figures asked for in yours of the
29th ult. are appended. I have not prepared any
additional figures for Corps troops, as they were
included in those supplied on the 21st ult.
I made one important typographical error
in the figures, for officers wounded in the 1st
Division,sent, on the 21st ;please amend to read
233 in place of 133.
Yours sincerely,
AJWithers
J. Balfour Esq.,
Victoria Barracks,
Paddington. N.S.W.
 

 


TOTAL A.I.F. BATTIE CASUALTIES IN THE FIVE AUSTRALIAN DIVISIONS DURING THE PERIODS SPECIFIED

14x13 Table - see original document


Extracted from statistics compiled by Australian Section, 3rd Echelon, B.E.F. from
Field Returns and Hospital Reports.
Ist December 1932
A.J.W.
 

 

29 November 1932.
A.J. WITHERS, Esq.,
Defence Department,
Melbourne.
Dear Withers,
Many thanks for the details of casualties enclosed with
your letter of 21st November. Dr Bean would now like to obtain
if available, particulars, as under, for periods specified:
A.I.F. Total Battle Casualties -                          Off.      O.R.
1st Aust. Div. (20 July to 12 Nov. 1917)             . . . .      . . . . . .
2nd Aust. Div. (20 July to 21 Nov. 1917)           . . . .      . . . . . .
3rd Aust. Div. (15 Sept to 20 Oct. 1917)           . . . .      . . . . . .
4th Aust. Div. (15 Sept to 25 Oct. 1917)           . . . .      . . . . . .
5th Aust. Div. (19 July to 12 Nov. 1917)             . . . .      . . . . . .
Yours sincerely,
 

 

TELEPHONE:
CENTRAL 4780.
 COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE,
MELBOURNE,
21st November 1932
Dear John,
I am enclosing a statement of A.I.F.
casualties during the period 31st July - 15th November
1917 (inclusive). As you omitted to state whether
you required Non-battle casualties as well as Battle
casualties I have prepared figures of the totals
by cause and have left you to make the additions
suitable to your requirements.
Yours sincerely,
A . J. Withers
J. Balfour Esq.,
Victoria Barracks,
Padding ton. N.S.W.
 

 

 

A.I.F. CASUALTIES IN FRANCE 31ST JULY TO 15TH NOVEMEER 1917 (INCLUSIVE)
 

18x15 Table - see original document

Extracted from statistics compiled by 3rd Echelon from Field Returns and Hospital Reports.
21st November 1932
A.J.W.
 

 

18 November 1932.
A.J. Withers, Esq.,
Defence Department,
Melbourne.
Dear Withers,
When I was in Melbourne, I think you told me
that you can readily put your hand on detailed figures of
A.I.F. casualties. If so, Dr Bean would like to obtain
the following -
[* 20 July 22 June - 1112Nov

20 July 31 Jy - 11 Nov

Sept 15 30 Jy - 2021Oct

Sept 15 - 2723 25       " 

19 July - 12 Nov*]

A.I.F. CASUALTIES IN FRANCE. 31 JULY - 15 NOV., 1917 (INCLUSIVE):

                                                        Officers          O.R.

1st Australian Division                . . . .               . . . . . .

2nd A     "               "                       . . . .               . . . . . .

3rd          "               "                       . . . .               . . . . . .

4th          "               "                       . . . .               . . . . . .
5th          "               "                        . . . .               . . . . . .

Other A.I.F. units in France        . . . .               . . . . . .
                                                        ——————–————

                                                        ——————–————
If the figures are not available for this precise period,
perhaps you could obtain the totals for the months August-
November inclusive. But, if this request involves a
great deal of research, do not go ahead with it; we may
be able to find another way of indicating in the volume
the point which Dr Bean wishes to bring out.
Yours sincerely,
 

 

Dear A.J.W.
With regand to the gas casualties
in the attached letters, would you
be so good as to let me know
whether among those cited in the 

second letter (as you did in the first one), there were any fatal

cases? If so could you let me

 know the total deaths (in the second list)?

Yours sincerely

CEWB

16/1/33

 

Dear Baz.

There were no deaths from Gas Poisoning

in the Army Brigades or

D.a.C.'s during the period

shown. Of course it is possible

that some ultimately died
of the effects of gas
but none are recorded

in the statistical

records held.

Yours.A.J.W.

18.1.33

 

 

170 THE AUSTRALIANS AT RABAUL [Dec., 1914
It appears strange that at this stage, and without reference
to or consultation with Holmes, Pethebridge should have made
recommendations relative to matters which, it might have been
assumed, fell solely within the jurisdiction of the Administrator

 of New Guinea. Especially is this remarkable in viey
of the original instructions given to him that "in carrying out
your mission the Government do not desire you to take any
action with regard to any matters affecting the possessions
south of the equator, with which the Administrator at Rabaul
has already dealt." Pethebridge apparently took the view that
these instructions had been cancelled by the abandonment of
the North-West Pacific Expedition, and that, in his capacity
as Secretary for Defence, he now had a general authority to
make recommendations to the Minister, with whom his
relations had naturally been most intimate and confidential.
In this he may have been right. It must, however, be frankly
admitted that in his reports to Melbourne (both on this
occasion and, later, on that of his first arrival at Rabaul) he
evinced a tendency to embark upon hasty and rather sweeping
criticism of the structure of the military administration
adopted by Holmes. Yet it was the same structure which
he himself subsequently retained, with little modification.
With the knowledge he afterwards acquired of conditions in
New Guinea, he would have strenuously opposed the partition
of the Territory into two independent administrative spheres,
which would, in fact, have been a serious mistake, retarding
the growth and destroying the cohesion of the administration.
In his report to Melbourne from Madang Pethebridge
also stated that most of the troops forming the garrison there,
as well as Bracegirdle's men who had been sent from Rabaul
for the Sepik River expedition, were discontented and anxious
to return to Australia as were also, he was informed, the
remainder of Holmes's force. As the islands north of the
equator were now beyond Australian jurisdiction, he said he
would proceed to Rabaul, taking back with him the greater
part of Bracegirdle's contingent, and would then report more
definitely how to utilise the Eastern troops. It would, he
continued, be necessary to relieve the garrison at Nauru. On
his return from Nauru the members of the Tropical Force
 
 

 
Last edited by:
Sam scottSam scott
Last edited on:

Last updated: