Charles E W Bean, Diaries, AWM38 3DRL 606/254/1 - 1917 - 1933 - Part 21

Conflict:
First World War, 1914–18
Subject:
  • Documents and letters
Status:
Open for review
Accession number:
RCDIG1066691
Difficulty:
2

Page 1 / 10

9. If the number of prisoners according to 3rd Echelon is deducted from the number of missing shown in the War Office statistics, the difference represents the number of missing who should be allocated to wounded or dead. If the necessary adjustment be then made, as shown below, it will be observed that the amended totals in the War Office statistics are brought approximately into agreement with each other and also, if allowance is made for differences in the lengths of the periods covered, with the 3rd Echelon record mentioned in the next para :- Total missing 3185 Prisoners of war 205 (3rd Echelon) 2980 Total by months 26165 13067 200 Deduct "surplus" missing from dead and add to wounded and prisoners 700 2980 39458 10087 29371 July/Dec. Total by campaign periods - 5489 22627 3185 Add 3rd Aust.Div. (3rd Echelon) 2259 6156 7748 28783 3192 Add "surplus" missing to dead and subtract from missing 2830 2830 39723 10728 28783 212 31st July/ 31st Dec. hrd Bchelor statistics 09 10084 27877 132 31st July/ 15th Nov. AUSTRALIAN CASUALTIES DURING THIRD YPRES PERIOD. 8. It will be apparent from the statements made in the preceding paragraphs that the war Office and the two lots of Australian statistics agree reasonably closely and that, having regard to the manner in which they were compiled, the Australian statistics must be more nearly accurate. Of the two Australian records, 3rd Echelon statistics, being available for France on a day to day basis, are the more suitable for use in that from this source alone can the casualties during a specified period be obtained. Ifethe 3rd Echelon statistics are therefore accepted, and the period 31st July/15th November, 1917 prescribed, the A.I.F. casualties in France while the 3rd Battle of Ypres was being fought were:-
10. Deaths - Killed in action 7700 2254 Died of Wounds Died of gas poisoning Accidentally killed Died of disease 40 10084 oned 20 Wounded Gas 3106 Shell-shock Self-inflicted wounds Accidentally wounded 118 27877 Prisoners of war 132 30093 MR. CHURCHILL'S ESTIMATE. (a) The History of the 5th Australian Division contains a reference to a statement of the casualties at Ypres between the 31st July and 18th November, 1917, by Mr. Winston Churchill. This was made in the House of Commons and was reported in Hansard as follows :- "Major Entwistle asked the Secretary of State for War if he could state what were the total casualties suffered by the British, Canadian, and Australian troops respectively in the Ypres Salient during the operations commencing 31st July, 1917, and ending on the 11th November, 1917. Mr. Churchill: I will give the figures for the period 31st July, 1917, to the 18th November, 1917, as we have these readily available and they are probably what my honourable and gallant friend requires. The figures are - Regular and Territorial Forces. Officers 10,70 Other ranks 207,838 Canadian Contingent. Officers 196 Other ranks 11,917 Australian Contingent. 1,289 Officers Other ranks 26,502. These totals include all killed, wounded and missing (including prisoners) as well as deaths from wounds and other causes.
11. According to the figures for campaign periods in the War Office statistics the casualties were :- British Officers Other ranks. 84873 (Regular Forces HITN 31/7-19/9 1267 2734i (T.F. 7827 20/9-31/12 (Regular Forces 140464 2615 52455 305133 16483 Deduct 2992 46047 Cambrai 66239 1043 20192 4035 20/11-31/12 12448 238894 Australia 31/7-19/ 3125 164 26693 20/9-31/12 1999 1483 29818 Deduct Cambrai 6w 843 28975 1419 Canada 3o a 743 7666 29460 1179 Deduct Cambrai 60 107 28408 1119 It will be observed that the War Office statistics give a higher figure in all cases than Mr. Churchill. It appears probable that Mr. Churchill's figures (c) were supplied by C2, Cas., War Office, from the records on which the printed volume of statistics (not then published) was based. The explanation of the discrepancy is no doubt that the two sets of figures do not refer to exactly the same thing. The War Office statistics cover all the British casualties on the Western Front while the 3rd Battle of Ypres was being fought; Mr. Churchill's figures were specially compiled to show the casualties only in the Ypres sector. (d) In the case of the Australian casualties, it is noticeable that the figures given by Mr. Churchill agree closely with the War Office record for 19th September/3lst December:- Mr. Churchill 26502 1289 26693 War Office 1319 The I Anzac Corps fighting at Ypres was done between 19th September and 15th November, and if Mr. Churchill's figures were based on the Corps' casualties while it was actually in the Ypres
12. area they would doubtless be about what they are. They would nevertheless still be "light" because, as explained elsewhere in this statement, the War Office record of the Australian casualties in the second of the 3rd Ypres periods does not apparently include those of the 3rd Australian Division. GENERAL WHITE'S ESTIMATE. The Official Historian has noted that there is 10. (a) in existence a statement by General white to the effect that the Australian casualties at Ypres averaged 6,000 per division. This would give a total of 30,000 as against the 3rd Echelon total of 38,000. without having an opportunity of studying General White's statement, it is difficult to account for the discrepancy. It is understood, however, that the statement was made in connection with the reinforcement problem, and it is not unreasonable to assume that General White's figure may have excluded the lightly wounded who had not left their units and could be expected to re-join after a short absence. In other words, he may have disregarded the wounded not evacuated from France. (b) It has not been found possible to discover a record in which the evacuations of sick and wounded from France are shown separately. Other records (Horseferry Road typed statistics) disclose, however, that the monthly number of sick was fairly constant, the other ranks evacuated sick from their units between April, 1917, and March, 1918, being 7535, 6379, 6435, 7175, 6121, 5972, 8290, 6234, 6481, 7614, 6494, 7576. From the same source it has been learned that the sick and wounded embarked from France in the quiet months of July and August, 1917, were 3484 and 3838. As the Australian divisions were not engaged in active operations in these months, it may be assumed that the embarkations consisted mainly of sick, say, 3,000 in each month. This might be accepted as the number of Australian sick evacuated monthly from France. According to the Horseferry Road typed (c) statistics the total embarkations of sick and wounded from France during the period July/November, 1917, were:- Officers Other ranks. 3484 July 165 3838 August 163 September 219 NTTH October 612 13141 310 November 6363 1473 31600 33073 If 15,000 (five months at 3,000 per month) are deducted for sick, this would leave 18,000 wounded evacuated. The total wounded The during the period were (according to 3rd Echelon) 30,305. difference between the total wounded and the estimate of wounded evacuated is 12,305 This approximates to the difference of 11,All between the total casualties for the same period (July/ November) (41,A1l) and the30,000 mentioned by General White. According to the Statistical volume of the British Medical History the proportion of wounded in the B.E.F. "returned to duty in theatre of war" in 1917 was 138,769 out of 564,694 admissions. This is roughly 25% which also agrees with the percentage by which General White's estimate falls below the 3rd Echelon figures.
13. WAR DIARY AND OTHER ESTIMATES (a) Various statements regarding casualties appear 11. These were based on in war diaries and reports on operations. reports by units belonging to the formations by which the report was submitted or estimate prepared. They must, however, have been based on reports by battalions, etc., and, having regard to the circumstances in which they were compiled, could not be more They would, for example, have than approximate statements. attempted to give the casualties during actual fighting; losses sustained while holding the line would most likely be omitted. A unit would have inadequate information regarding its personnel. Furthermore, such statements could not pretend to have the same degree of accuracy as statistics compiled at the base where all casualties had to be supported by the names of the men concerned, and where facilities existed for the discovery and amendment of incorrect report. As mentioned earlier in this statement, the War Office, 3rd Echelon, and Horseferry Road statistics practic- ally agree and, this being the case, it has not been thought it would serve any useful purpose to attempt to confirm these three sets of statistics by extracting information from war diaries and operation reports. In studying the problem certain information was, however, discovered, and it may be well to bring it to the Official Historian's notice in this statement in case the question is further discussed at a later date. In the first place it was noticed that there (b) was a marked discrepancy between the battle casualties for all arms recorded monthly in the war diary of the Adjutant-General at General Headquarters and the corresponding record in the War The figures during the 3rd Battle of Ypres Office statistics. were as follow:- war Office Statistics A.G., G.H.O. O.R. O.R. 51191 29 80741 July 5086 1035 286 76914 August 77419 3494 59201 September 5710 5305 99968 114503 October 4917 Boh 47403 November 2852 70084 December 36611 2529 2009 47581 23008 So 21848 409342 -- 431190 479340 The figures given are stated to be "Total casualties (killed, wounded, and missing). All arms." (c) It may be fairly assumed that figures given by an army would be based on information supplied by its corps. If, however, the casualties which appear in the weekly operation reports compiled by I Anzac G.S. are compared with the I Anzac Corps casualties contained in 2nd Army records, there are, as will be seen from the figures hereunder, marked discrepancies:-
14. 2nd Army G.S. I Anzac G.S. O.R. O.R. 380 9036 20/27. 9.17 286 Wended 27.9.17 60 175 4.10.1/ 3851 2996 W/ended 4.10.17 180 9/12 October 4522 1950 11.10.17 284 60 2625 18.10.17 108 W/ended 19.10.17 174 1423 25 59 25.10.17 26.10.1/ 1.11.1/ 1146 46 No later reports available. 8.11.17 706 20 15.11.17 504 1099 23816 24915 (d) It has been stated in (c) above that the I Anzac records show that the total casualties in the corps between the 20th September and 15th November, 1917, were 24915. This statement, when reconciled, roughly agrees with the 3rd Echelon figures: I Anzac G.S. (lst, 2nd, Ath and 5th Divisions and Corps Troops) 20th September/15th November, 1917 24915 Add 3rd Echelon figures for:- I Anzac Corps (as above) (31st July to 19th 3386 September, 1917) 3rd Australian Division 31st July/15th November 6986 10372 35287 3rd Echelon, all Australian units, 31st July/15th November 200093 It was also noted that weekly returns of (e) wounded submitted by armies give the total wounded in I and II Anzac Corps Troops and the five divisions as 22721 between the 29th July and 17th November, 1917. 3rd Echelon records that the Australian wounded between the 31st July and 15th November were 27877. The above discrepancies may be capable of (f) They may have been due to the explanation in various ways. imperfect data on which they were based, or they may have disregarded slightly wounded, or it may have been considered desirable to minimise the losses sustained during the 3rd Battle They do not disprove the 3rd Echelon figures which of Ypres. appear to be based on more reliable data. 12. (a) In the course of investigating the problem dealt with in this statement the Statistical volume of the British Medical History was consulted. The tables in this volume do not permit of comparison with the war Office statistics. It was, however, noted that the former gives the total B.E.F. casualties in 1917 as 75867 1 (including died of disease) while the latter gives 817790 - a difference of 50881 or approx. 7%.
15. Dr. Bean has stated that the British Official Historian has mentioned this percentage as representing an ascertained margin of error but the exact significance of General Edmonds' statement is not known. It is possible, however, that it is based on his acceptance of the British Medical History statistics, the proofs of which he read and in connection with which he made suggestions as being more reliable than the War Office figures. (b) In the introduction to the British Medical Statistical volume it is stated :- The British Medical Statistical volume was not available when this statement was typed, but the required extracts will be forwarded to you by Tuesday's mail, 21st March. It will be apparent from the words underlined that the British Medical statistics are based on cards kept by general and stationary hospitals and would exclude the lightly wounded who were dealt with by regimental medical officers and did not have to leave their units. It is significant that a table which appears on p.20 of the volume in question states that approx. 7% of the wounded were returned to duty "from front line medical units" The fact that this percentage is given implies that the compilers of the statistics did have particulars of the lightly wounded and thus may seem to contradict the inference that they excluded such cases from the battle casualties. The two statements are however not necessarily contradictory as the compilers of the British medical statistics worked on different sets of figures and some of their tables are based on sample sets. While it is possible that the British (c) medical statistics may exclude the lightly wounded, they would certainly be included in the Australian figures as it was the practice for lightly wounded who remained with their units to be recorded as wounded in the weekly returns and Part II Order whence they reached the Australian statistics. .... ... ...
TELEGRAPHIC ADORESS TELEPHONE Nos. COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. "AUSWARMUSE" 25 2ses. CowMUNos Aas o Th OIREcTos." AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL. "They dave their lives. For ihat publie gitt they n a ouos Post orics sox z?e p. vereived a praise which neves aces and s tomb mos s'orious – no so much the tomb in EXHIBITION BUILDINGS, MELSOURNE 21314 which they He but that in whch their ame . zurvives, toberemembered for evewhenoccasion comes fof word of deed .. 21st March, 1933. Dear Mr. Bazley, Further to my letter of the 15t March under cover of which was forwarded to you a statement in regard to the Australian casualties during the Third Battle of Ypres, it was necessary owing to the British Medical Statistical volume not being available at the time the statement was being typed, to omit certain extracts from that work which were to have been included on page 15 of the statement. The necessary extracts have now been made and are enclosed herewith. It will be appreciated if you will kindly arrange to have them inserted in the appropriate place in the copy of the statement forwarded to you. Yours singerely, Aheloun Mr. A. W. Bazley, C/- Official Historian, Victoria Barracks Paddington, N.S.W.
"With forces increasing in different parts of the world, with unwieldy, inaccurate records coming in, with growing expenditure and an ambitious general scheme to carry out, the central organisation as originally established proved insufficient. Additional financial assistance and new methods were required, and in June 1917 the War Office agreed to take over the actual cost of the routine statistical work. To overcome the numerous difficulties associated with record- keeping, the system of keeping an official medical histor card for every patient admitted to a medical unit was introduced intoallthe forces. This card amplified all the information contained in the admission and discharge books regarding the case and reproduced it in a more easily handled form. These index cards were kept officially by general and stationary hospitals, and at the end of every six months the completed cards were sent to the statistical department of the Medical Research Council to be used later as data for the statistics regarding the medical aspects of the war. Although the revised scheme was apparently ideal, it miscarried. Mistakes were made on every side; wrong cards arrived in some theatres of war; in others, cards and instructions did not arrive together. Forces in many theatres of war were constantly moving, fighting, reorganising units and formations, or were so scattered over vast areas of country that when the right cards and full instructions were received it was well¬ nigh impossible to distribute them, cancel the old system and establish the new. Theresult wasthe British Expeditionary Force in France was the only one to keep up trustworthy records; in other forces the cards were either not used or, if used, were of little value when completed, owing to inaccuracies.
TELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS TELEPHONE Nos. "AUSWARMUSE." COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. F 2 e 2298. CowOcatows vo es Apoazssso o AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL. T scros. TTher zue diar Mra, Fer duspnudesttgg eost oacs sox :e o n a a o veceived a praise which neves asee and s tomb mos slorious –not so muuch the tomb im EXHIBITION BUILDINGS, MELBOURNE. which hey He. but that in which their ame . 12) 3149 survives, oberemembered t or ever whesoccasion comes to word o deed 28th March, 1933. Dear Mr. Bazley, The statement regarding Australian casualties during the 3rd Battle of Ypres was typed and despatched while I was absent from the office. Heyes noticed a discrepancy at the end of the paragraph on the top of page 6. Actually there is an unintentional duplication which Heyes corrected in the manner shown on the copy of the statement sent to you. The mistake which I made in drafting the statement should, however"been corrected by deleting the last sentence but one, and allowing the last sentence to stand as originally typed. Yours sincerely, ajellit Mr. A.W. Bazley, c/o Official Historian, Victoria Barracks Paddington N0N.

9.
If the number of prisoners according to 3rd Echelon is deducted
from the number of missing shown in the War Office statistics,
the difference represents the number of missing who should be
allocated to wounded or dead.  If the necessary adjustment be
then made, as shown below, it will be observed that the amended
totals in the War Office statistics are brought approximately
into agreement with each other and also, if allowance is made
for differences in the lengths of the periods covered, with the
3rd Echelon record mentioned in the next para :-
Total missing          3185
Prisoners of war
(3rd Echelon)           205

                                  2980

Total by months -     13067       26165       226

Deduct "surplus"
missing from dead
and add to wounded
and prisoners                 2980          2980

                                          10087         29371      =    39458

                                                                                     July/Dec
Total by campaign
periods -                     5489      22627      3185

Add 3rd Aust.Div.
(3rd Echelon) -          2259         6156            7

                                      7748      28783      3192
Add "surplus"
missing to dead
and subtract
from missing            2980                       2980

                                    10728       28783        212    =      39723
                                                                                           31st July/
                                                                                           31st Dec.
3rd Echelon
statistics                   10084      27877        132    =       38093
                                                                                           31st July/
                                                                                           15th Nov.

AUSTRALIAN CASUALTIES DURING
THIRD YPRES PERIOD

8. It will be apparent from the statements made in the
preceding paragraphs that the War Office and the two lots of
Australian statistics agree reasonably closely and that, having
regard to the manner in which they were compiled, the Australian
statistics must be more nearly accurate.  Of the two Australian
records, 3rd Echelon statistics, being available for France on a
day to day basis, are the more suitable for use in that from
this source alone can the casualties during a specified period
be obtained.  If the 3rd Echelon statistics are therefore
accepted, and the period 31st July/15th November, 1917
prescribed, the A.I.F. casualties in France while the 3rd Battle
of Ypres was being fought were:-
 

 

10.
Deaths -
Killed in action                  7700
Died of Wounds                2254
Died of gas poisoning          63
Accidentally killed                 27
Died of disease                      40          10084

Wounded
Wounded                         24063
Gas                                        3106
Shell-shock                           539
Self-inflicted wounds            51
Accidentally wounded        118          27877
Prisoners of war -                                      132  

                                                                  ______
                                                                 38093
 

MR. CHURCHILL'S ESTIMATE.
9. (a) The History of the 5th Australian Division
contains a reference to a statement of the casualties at Ypres
between the 31st July and 18th November, 1917, by Mr. Winston
Churchill.  This was made in the House of Commons and was
reported in Hansard as follows :-
"Major Entwistle asked the Secretary of State
for War if he could state what were the total
casualties suffered by the British, Canadian, and
Australian troops respectively in the Ypres
Salient during the operations commencing 31st July,
1917, and ending on the 11th November, 1917.
Mr. Churchill: I will give the figures for
the period 31st July, 1917, to the 18th November,
1917, as we have these readily available and they
are probably what my honourable and gallant friend
requires.  The figures are -
Regular and Territorial Forces.
Officers                           10,795
Other ranks                207,838
Canadian Contingent.
Officers                               496
Other ranks                     11,917
Australian Contingent.
Officers                             1,289
Other ranks                  26,502.
These totals include all killed, wounded and missing
(including prisoners) as well as deaths from wounds
and other causes. "
 

 

11.
(b)  According to the figures for campaign periods in
the War Office statistics the casualties were :-
British                                                                 Officers        Other ranks.
31/7-19/9        (Regular Forces                             4474            84873
                        (T.F.                                                    1267              27341
 

20/9-31/12     (Regular Forces                             7827           140464
                                                                                  2615              52455
                                                                               16483            305133
Deduct                  2992        46047
Cambrai                 1043        20192                    4035              66239
20/11-31/12                                                             12448           238894
Australia
31/7-19/9                                                                   164                 3125
20/9-31/12                                                                1319             26693
                                                                                1483              29818
Deduct Cambrai                                                    64                  843
                                                                                1419              28975


Canada
31/7-19/9                                                                  436               11794
                                                                                  743              17666
                                                                                 1179             29460
Deduct Cambrai                                                    60                1052

                                                                                  1119            28408

It will be observed that the War Office statistics give a higher
figure in all cases than Mr. Churchill.
(c)  It appears probable that Mr. Churchill's figures
were supplied by C2, Cas., War Office, from the records on which
the printed volume of statistics (not then published) was based.
The explanation of the discrepancy is no doubt that the two sets
of figures do not refer to exactly the same thing.  The War
Office statistics cover all the British casualties on the
Western Front while the 3rd Battle of Ypres was being fought;
Mr. Churchill's figures were specially compiled to show the
casualties only in the Ypres sector.
(d)  In the case of the Australian casualties, it is
noticeable that the figures given by Mr. Churchill agree closely
with the War Office record for 19th September/3lst December:-
Mr. Churchill      -      1289        26502
War Office          -      1319         26693
The I Anzac Corps fighting at Ypres was done between 19th
September and 15th November, and if Mr. Churchill's figures were
based on the Corps' casualties while it was actually in the Ypres
 

 

12.
area they would doubtless be about what they are.  They would
nevertheless still be "light" because, as explained elsewhere
in this statement, the War Office record of the Australian
casualties in the second of the 3rd Ypres periods does not
apparently include those of the 3rd Australian Division.
GENERAL WHITE'S ESTIMATE.
10.  (a)  The Official Historian has noted that there is
in existence a statement by General White to the effect that the
Australian casualties at Ypres averaged 6,000 per division.
This would give a total of 30,000 as against the 3rd Echelon
total of 38,000.  Without having an opportunity of studying
General White's statement, it is difficult to account for the
discrepancy.  It is understood, however, that the statement was
made in connection with the reinforcement problem, and it is not
unreasonable to assume that General White's figure may have
excluded the lightly wounded who had not left their units and
could be expected to re-join after a short absence.  In other
words, he may have disregarded the wounded not evacuated from
France.
(b)  It has not been found possible to discover a
record in which the evacuations of sick and wounded from France
are shown separately.  Other records (Horseferry Road typed
statistics) disclose, however, that the monthly number of sick
was fairly constant, the other ranks evacuated sick from their
units between April, 1917, and March, 1918, being 7535, 6379,
6435, 7175, 6121, 5972, 8290, 6234, 6481, 7614, 6494, 7576.
From the same source it has been learned that the sick and
wounded embarked from France in the quiet months of July and
August, 1917, were 3484 and 3838.  As the Australian divisions
were not engaged in active operations in these months, it may be
assumed that the embarkations consisted mainly of sick, say,
3,000 in each month.  This might be accepted as the number of
Australian sick evacuated monthly from France.
(c)  According to the Horseferry Road typed
statistics the total embarkations of sick and wounded from France
during the period July/November, 1917, were:-
                                                        Officers              Other ranks.
July                                                      165                           3484

August                                                167                           3838

September                                        219                            4774
October                                              612                            13141
November                                         310                            6363
                                                           1473                          31600 

                                                                           33073
If 15,000 (five months at 3,000 per month) are deducted for sick,
this would leave 18,000 wounded evacuated.  The total wounded
during the period were (according to 3rd Echelon) 30,305.  The
difference between the total wounded and the estimate of wounded
evacuated is 12,305.  This approximates to the difference of
11,411 between the total casualties for the same period (July/
November) (41,41l) and the 30,000 mentioned by General White.
According to the Statistical volume of the British Medical
History the proportion of wounded in the B.E.F. "returned to duty
in theatre of war" in 1917 was 138,769 out of 564,694 admissions.
This is roughly 25% which also agrees with the percentage by
which General White's estimate falls below the 3rd Echelon
figures.
 

 

13.
WAR DIARY AND OTHER ESTIMATES
11.  (a)  Various statements regarding casualties appear
in war diaries and reports on operations.  These were based on
reports by units belonging to the formations by which the report
was submitted or estimate prepared.  They must, however, have
been based on reports by battalions, etc., and, having regard to
the circumstances in which they were compiled, could not be more
than approximate statements.  They would, for example, have
attempted to give the casualties during actual fighting; losses
sustained while holding the line would most likely be omitted.
A unit would have inadequate information regarding its personnel.
Furthermore, such statements could not pretend to have the same
degree of accuracy as statistics compiled at the base where all
casualties had to be supported by the names of the men concerned,
and where facilities existed for the discovery and amendment of
incorrect reports.  As mentioned earlier in this statement, the
War Office, 3rd Echelon, and Horseferry Road statistics practically
agree and, this being the case, it has not been thought it
would serve any useful purpose to attempt to confirm these three
sets of statistics by extracting information from war diaries and
operation reports.  In studying the problem certain information
was, however, discovered, and it may be well to bring it to the
Official Historian's notice in this statement in case the
question is further discussed at a later date.
(b)  In the first place it was noticed that there 

was a marked discrepancy between the battle casualties for all
arms recorded monthly in the war diary of the Adjutant-General at
General Headquarters and the corresponding record in the War
Office statistics.  The figures during the 3rd Battle of Ypres
were as follow:-
                                                        War Office
                                                         Statistics                          A.G., G.H.Q.# 
                                                  O.                 O.R.                      O.                O.R.
 

July                                        3954           80741                    2970               51191

August                                  4166            76914                   5086           103998

September                           3770           77479                  3494              59201

October                                 5305          114503                  4917              99968 

November                            3804          70084                  2852             47403

December                            2009           36611                    2529             47581

                                               23008        456332                 21848           409342

                                                       479340                                      431190
#The figures given are stated to be "Total casualties
(killed, wounded, and missing).  All arms."
(c) It may be fairly assumed that figures given by
an army would be based on information supplied by its corps. If,
however, the casualties which appear in the weekly operation
reports compiled by I Anzac G.S. are compared with the I Anzac
Corps casualties contained in 2nd Army records, there are, as
will be seen from the figures hereunder, marked discrepancies:-
 

 

14.
                                     I Anzac G.S.                                                            2nd Army G.S.
                                        O.             O.R.                                                      O.             O.R.
20/27. 9.17                    380           9036            W/ended 27.9.17          286           6803

W/ended 4.10.17          175            3851                     "         4.10.17           189           2996
                  11.10.17          284          4522                    9/12 October           60           1950

                  18.10.17         108            2625            W/ended 19.10.17          174           3775

                 25.10.17           55             1423                     "        26.10.17           59           1387
                     1.11.17          40             1149               No later reports available.
                    8.11.17           37              706

                   15.11.17           20              504

                                      1099          23816

                                             24915

(d)  It has been stated in (c) above that the I
Anzac records show that the total casualties in the corps between
the 20th September and 15th November, 1917, were 24915.  This
statement, when reconciled, roughly agrees with the 3rd Echelon
figures :-
I Anzac G.S. (lst, 2nd, 4th
and 5th Divisions and Corps
Troops) 20th September/15th
November, 1917                                                                        24915
Add 3rd Echelon figures for:-
I Anzac Corps (as above)
(31st July to 19th
September, 1917)                                          3386


3rd Australian Division
31st July/15th November                           6986                   10372
                                                                                                     35287

3rd Echelon, all Australian units,
31st July/15th November                                                       38093
 

(e)  It was also noted that weekly returns of
wounded submitted by armies give the total wounded in I and II
Anzac Corps Troops and the five divisions as 22721 between the
29th July and 17th November, 1917.  3rd Echelon records that
the Australian wounded between the 31st July and 15th November
were 27877.
(f)  The above discrepancies may be capable of
explanation in various ways. They may have been due to the
imperfect data on which they were based, or they may have
disregarded slightly wounded, or it may have been considered
desirable to minimise the losses sustained during the 3rd Battle
of Ypres.  They do not disprove the 3rd Echelon figures which
appear to be based on more reliable data.
12.  (a)  In the course of investigating the problem
dealt with in this statement the Statistical volume of the
British Medical History was consulted.  The tables in this volume
do not permit of comparison with the War Office statistics. It
was, however, noted that the former gives the total B.E.F.
casualties in 1917 as 758671 (including died of disease) while
the latter gives 817790 - a difference of 50881 or approx. 7%.
 

 

15.
Dr. Bean has stated that the British Official Historian has
mentioned this percentage as representing an ascertained margin
of error but the exact significance of General Edmonds'
statement is not known.  It is possible, however, that it is
based on his acceptance of the British Medical History
statistics, the proofs of which he read and in connection with
which he made suggestions as being more reliable than the War
Office figures.
(b) In the introduction to the British
Medical Statistical volume it is stated :-
The British Medical Statistical volume was not
available when this statement was typed,
but the required extracts will be forwarded
to you by Tuesday's mail, 21st March.

It will be apparent from the words underlined that the British
Medical statistics are based on cards kept by general and
stationary hospitals and would exclude the lightly wounded who
were dealt with by regimental medical officers and did not
have to leave their units.  It is significant that a table
which appears on p. 20 of the volume in question states that
approx. 7% of the wounded were returned to duty "from front
line medical units".  The fact that this percentage is given
implies that the compilers of the statistics did have
particulars of the lightly wounded and thus may seem to
contradict the inference that they excluded such cases from the
battle casualties.  The two statements are however not
necessarily contradictory as the compilers of the British
medical statistics worked on different sets of figures and some
of their tables are based on sample sets.
(c)  While it is possible that the British
medical statistics may exclude the lightly wounded, they would
certainly be included in the Australian figures as it was the
practice for lightly wounded who remained with their units to
be recorded as wounded in the weekly returns and Part II Order
whence they reached the Australian statistics.
 

 

TELEPHONE Nos.
F 2597                                                                                                      

F 2598
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA.
TELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS
"AUSWARMUSE"      
COMMUNICATIONS TO BE ADDRESSED TO
"THE DIRECTOR"
IN REPLY PLEASE QUOTE
No. 12/3/49    
AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL

POST OFFICE BOX 214D

EXHIBITION BUILDINGS, MELBOURNE.   
"They gave their lives. For that public gift they
received a praise which never ages and a
tomb most glorious - not so much the tomb in
which they lie, but that which their fame
survives, to be remembered for ever when occasion
calls for word or deed....."

21st March, 1933.
Dear Mr. Bazley,
Further to my letter of the 15th March
under cover of which was forwarded to you a statement
in regard to the Australian casualties during the
Third Battle of Ypres, it was necessary owing to the
British Medical Statistical volume not being available
at the time the statement was being typed, to omit
certain extracts from that work which were to have
been included on page 15 of the statement.  The
necessary extracts have now been made and are enclosed
herewith.  It will be appreciated if you will kindly
arrange to have them inserted in the appropriate place
in the copy of the statement forwarded to you.
Yours sincerely,
JRTreloar
Mr. A. W. Bazley,
C/- Official Historian,
Victoria Barracks,
Paddington, N.S.W.
 

 

"With forces increasing in different parts of the
world, with unwieldy, inaccurate records coming in, with
growing expenditure and an ambitious general scheme to carry
out, the central organisation as originally established proved
insufficient.  Additional financial assistance and new
methods were required, and in June 1917 the War Office agreed
to take over the actual cost of the routine statistical work.
To overcome the numerous difficulties associated with record-
keeping, the system of keeping an official medical history
card for every patient admitted to a medical unit was
introduced into all the forces.  This card amplified all the
information contained in the admission and discharge books
regarding the case and reproduced it in a more easily handled
form.  These index cards were kept officially by general and
stationary hospitals, and at the end of every six months the
completed cards were sent to the statistical department of the
Medical Research Council to be used later as data for the
statistics regarding the medical aspects of the war.  Although
the revised scheme was apparently ideal, it miscarried.
Mistakes were made on every side; wrong cards arrived in some
theatres of war; in others, cards and instructions did not
arrive together.  Forces in many theatres of war were
constantly moving, fighting, reorganising units and formations,
or were so scattered over vast areas of country that when the
right cards and full instructions were received it was well-
nigh impossible to distribute them, cancel the old system and
establish the new.  The result was the British
Expeditionary Force in France was the only one to keep up
trustworthy records; in other forces the cards were either not
used or, if used, were of little value when completed, owing
to inaccuracies."
 

 

TELEPHONE Nos.
F 2597                                                                                                      

F 2598
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA.
TELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS
"AUSWARMUSE"      
COMMUNICATIONS TO BE ADDRESSED TO
"THE DIRECTOR"
IN REPLY PLEASE QUOTE
No. 12/3/49   
AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL

POST OFFICE BOX 214D

EXHIBITION BUILDINGS, MELBOURNE.   
"They gave their lives. For that public gift they
received a praise which never ages and a
tomb most glorious - not so much the tomb in
which they lie, but that which their fame
survives, to be remembered for ever when occasion
calls for word or deed....."
28th March, 1933.

Dear Mr. Bazley,
The statement regarding Australian casualties
during the 3rd Battle of Ypres was typed and despatched
while I was absent from the office.

Heyes noticed a discrepancy at the end of the
paragraph on the top of page 6.  Actually there is an
unintentional duplication which Heyes corrected in the
manner shown on the copy of the statement sent to you.
The mistake which I made in drafting the
statement should, however, have been corrected by deleting the
last sentence but one, and allowing the last sentence to
stand as originally typed.
Yours sincerely,

JRTreloar

Mr. A.W. Bazley,
c/o Official Historian,
Victoria Barracks
Paddington, NSW

 

 
Last edited by:
Ray WilsonRay Wilson
Last edited on:

Last updated: