Charles E W Bean, Diaries, AWM38 3DRL 606/247/1 - 1917 - 1933 - Part 4

Conflict:
First World War, 1914–18
Subject:
  • Documents and letters
Status:
Awaiting approval
Accession number:
RCDIG1066609
Difficulty:
5

Page 1 / 11

kindly you. Can the abov < put me on the nal. yninere Yours we T. As White ORIA 1661
TateNoNE t H41 CENTRAL 4780. 483 Bullecourt. AOORESS ALL COMMUNICATIONS TO THE SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. No DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE. MELBOURNE. cope Ac March 14 1923 My dear Pean thedocument refersed to was shown ing by one of the 14 fn offices who returned from pomany after the armistice I did Not see it at the War office. It was the intelligence summary of the rpoman Division opposing us which his fellow (Exanid) had piches up in the dugent. the yomans wessed it, in Learching It gave the names of him fraud Dunant, McSharry Prochman and self. and an gshmate of our charaderishes, vased on reports given by our prisoner (Castrahian) the 4t We were given a very blood thurstr chit in common with other Autraham troops and dates that if was the confant noticy of the Ide, to kell all prisoners except a few Tamples tthen went on to say that the capture of me inarmentiones ano
40 be rewarded by a money gratuly a follows fraud 1500 mark each W. was marks I hasten t aso that the mark had greater value then than now I was going to get a copy of the document wlh wee virily engagede on the now unlitary employmen detion of Denobr ot the tince and to missed the opportunity Itwa quile apparent that the prmang has aope of our te lsts. because the record of the tomanent officers was quite accurate Will endeavour to get touch with odmuds (I feel certain iwashe if you like, and ascertain of he has Hopeyeer the document still. are keeping very fit. Yours Sincerely Wleck
225h PAPPRTTON. A. L. P. ETEORE CL CETEATTOTE W BILFCOURT, 21th Anr2l. 1212. Referenee Haps, 570 N W and 51b S W. 1/10,000. (1) Tho Battalion was bivouaced at FAVREUIL and on the 3th April the C.C. made a personal reconnaissance of the ground with Battalion Staff and Company Conmanders. (2) There was a conference of C.C.'s at Prigate Handjuarters MORFULL at 10.50 a.n. on 5-4-17. And at 12 midnight or night 10/21th April, 1927. (3) On morning of 10th the Battalion was in rendiness to attack but ewing to tanks being late this attack was cancelled. No written Battalion orders were issued but the C.O. had (4) several conferences with Company Cormanders and officers, and all understeed their orders. These verbal orders were based on 4th Aus. Inf. Brizade Order No. 76 of 10-4-17 issued at 6 F.m., and the continuation order of came date issued at 10.15 p.M. My plan was to have the battalion entrenched in Railway (5) cutting fror C 5 d 2.8 to C 6 c 1.4. At 4.45 a.k. the battalion was to rove out in Artillery forration and Tollow the 16th Pattalion, and forming lines when the second objective was crossed, they were to push on in the following formation - - - - and dig in as follows:- Ar Coy. U 18 c 6.4. U 24 b 0.6 t0 Br Coy. U 24 b 0.6 U 24 a 9.5 t0 MCr Coy. to U 24 c 6.8 24 a 9.5 Dr Cor. U 24 0 6.6 to U24 0 4.0. Four Flatoons one ver company, were to assirt the tants in Mopping up RrINC 17F If the 16th Pattalion met with sericus opposition in taking the Hindenburg line, the 13th Battalion was to assist them, and then carry out their Tull orders as far as possible. Four Vickers Cuns of No. 1 Section, 4th A.W.C. Coy. under Lieut. Veness were attached to the battalion and were allotted one to each corpany. At 3.35 a.m. the Pattalion was in the rallway cutting ready to nove out, and I had a final conference with the officers. (6)
17) (2) At 4.45 a.m. punctuall; Ar and Br Companies moved out, Cr and Dr Conganys at distances of 200 yas. Tollowed later by As soon as they left the shelter of the cutting losses from shell fire commenced. When about 600 yards from the 1st objective the battalion came under heavy machine gun fire, which became more intense at the first wire and officers and men fell fast. The 16th Battalion had then taken the lst objective but were seen to be in very great difficulties with the 2nd objective, the wire in front of which was uncut, and it was only too evident that the 16th Battalion had suffered enormous losses from machine gun fire in taking the lst objective. The Lanks had then not reached the first trench; there was a Tank in the wire, and a German Machine gunronly 10 yards from it, firing This gun was put out of action by our heavily on our men. The 13th Battalion pressed on and with leading Company. (A. the 16th, took the 2nd objective, mainly by bonbing up the communication trenches and then bombing to the right and left. They soon established touch with the 14th Battalion on their left; and by bombing extended their right flank to U 30 b 0.6 and U 30 a 9.4. The machine gun fire rendered visual signalling impossibl. and the open ground swept by michine gun fire was almost certain death to runners, so that no messages were coming in to Battalion Headquarters, but at 7-15 a.m. Captain Murray wrote an account of the situation, which I received at 9 a.m. and transmitted to Brigade Headquarters by runner. About 7,20 a.m. a large arount of eneny movement was seen around REINCOURT. Captain Murray sent up S.O.S. flares for an artillery barrage but none was forthcoming. At about 7,30 a.m. the Germans counter-attacked by bombing down a cormunication trench from RTINCOURT. This was beaten off and a combined party of 13th and 16th bombers beat the enemy back this trench to within 100 yards of EEIMCOURT putting in a block. At the same time the enemy ccunter-attacked our right in the 2nd objective with bombs but were beaten back suffering heavy loss. At 9 a.m. a battalion of the enemy in close formation noving from QUTANT to the N. of REINCOURT was dispersed by our mackine gun fire, suffering heavy loss. From then until 10.45 a.m. cur xen were recorginizing and consolidating, during which time two small bribing attacks by the Germans on our left were beaten off. All the bombs were collected and durps made near each bombing block. Captain Murray went along the whole position and reports that the 4th Brigade held 900 yards of the Hindenburg line. He commenced the organization of the whole brigade position. At 10.45 a.m. heavy bomb attacks by the Germans were started from the right and left of both objectives, also down the communication trench from REINCOURT and a communication trench running N and 8 on the W. of REIMCOURT, six attacks in all. These attacks were very severe and our bombs were Quickly exhausted, and our men pressed back to the centre of our position from all sides. The Germans had nackine guns trained on the parapet which frustrated every endeavour on the part of our men to go along the top and attack the bombers with the bayonet. Attempts to call up an Artillery barrage by power buzzer and S.O.S. flares failed, the buszer being jamed by the Germans and the flares apparently not being observed. Kxcept where parties were cut off the ren tried to get back over the open under a fearful machine gun and rifle fire; the losses being very heavy. Shortly after noon the position was entirely evacuated.
(3) At nightfall, the rennants of the Pattalion (31 under sover the cutrosts of the 52nd Buttalion, withdrew to ORRUIL and thence To FAYRRUTL. The Tailure of the Tanks was the primary cause of our failure 10) to carry out our original plan. They were knecked cut by an anti-tank gun sitnated on the W. gide of REINCCURT, at a range of about 600 yards. This gun was right in the open shooting over open sights. To Tant reached the second objective, and only one (perhaps two) crossed the first objective. Cur men put the anti-tank gun out of action with Machine gun fire from the second objective, but by this tire it was too late to save the tarks. The fact that xxxk our artiflery were slow in putting a barrage on RTTUCOURT resulted in the borbing attacks being rressed with great vigour; also the gap between the 4th and 12th Brigades gave the Cermans a great advantage. We did not have anough had grenades or rifle grenadee, but the role allotted to the 13th Pattalion was an above-ground one, hence ve took more S.A.A. and fewer bombs. Creund flares were 11t at 8 a.mj T I cannot understand why the R.F.C. theuight we were in RELLCUURT. Our losses are as follows:- (10) E2lled Lownled. Maring Toaala Officers 21 Other ranks 19 112 489 358 25 118 367 510. 4. J Lieut-Colonel, C.C.,13th Pattalion, A.I.F. 10k1
5391. 22 January 1930. Lient.-Colonel H.W. Burray, V.C., C.M.G., D.Sede, D.C.M., Clenlyon, Mia Richmend. H.Llland. Dear Murray, I have been writing up the narrative of the First Pattle of Bullecourt. The records are fairly complete, but there are a few points on which I should be grateful for your help, 1f you could give it to mes- I remember your telling me that, on hearing of Black’. death, you looked for him, but I think you said that you were not sure whether you saw his body, though you were under the impression that you did. I should be glad if you could give me the benefit of your recollection on this point; also whether this was before, after, or during your survey of the trenches. (2) Some time before the final order to withdraw there was a conference of a number of officers which decided, if necessary, to leave the trench and hold on to a line of shell-holes. Can you tell me what officers were at this conference, for example, was Sommerville there? Aarons gave me moat of the names, which, as far as I know, included yourself, Gardiner, Hunmerston, Aarons, and Kerr. Was Sonmerville or Fletcher theref I have a note that all your platoon conmanders and your 131 runner were wounded. I think this occurred before reaching the trenches. Could you tell me 1f this was so, and what were their namens With Kind regards Yours sincerely, P.S. I think I remember your telling me years ago that some photographs of the Bullecourt fight were in existence. Could you put me on to anyone who would be likely to pessess them
Cleplyop. Richmond, N.Q. 123 30 Dear Caftain Bean I am enclosing reflies to your questions, Ilave forgotter quite a lot, the reflies are for your use puttrely, this is strictly private, & not in any way for publication It was George Gardener I first fight in France hes company. in fact B.C. DD Coys of to 13th had a pretty good passoge over, as the 16th supportedt A. coy of the 13th had for the time smasted the German fire. It was absolutely impossible to form any rear ling of defence with the German wire uncut, their absolute command of the position & good nsibility. I there were no sell holes I saw only 3 on my return journey from the genan trench Sorry Edont brow of any photograghs theres quite a lot one could Bullicourt- say, but its letter left unsaid, you would have your own ideas If the seracity of the various officers. Asions left- the trench long before the general retreat, although long refortshad gove back to the 13th 816th bos. With kindest regasds Yours Sincerely Hinneray
Cleplyop. Richmond. N.Q. R.p) Black was killed between the pront & support hiue & Gorman trench after capturing tthe pront line & attacking the support I saw his body within fifteen minutes of his being u. He was stot the head & as I through Ffe 16 atleck was posisting. bie I had on the support not time to even take his personal effects. 212) I cannot remember the names of the officers at the I never trench conference seriously entertained the idea shepl-holes. of forming a Gige & or digging in behind the German wire. First because there were proctically us stellholes, secondly the Germans comguanded the position, with enfilade oblique, & proutal fire. estimated we would get only
Cleplyop. Richmond. (2) N.Q. 10/ of any party through the Gorman wore & eese would not be physically or, mentally fit to did in or fight. (3) All my platoon confumander were wounded in the attac before reaching the German Trenches & my Gendier was wounded in or near the Germnan wire. His name was Stewart and a particularly wrave good lad. The only plaoon commander whose To can hame remember was John Brown womeled by maghine gun fire fully five hundred yards before reaching the wore & afterwards in early 1918, killed, at henve Eglise by a long range shell.
FL.4157 EAOOMMLEDE 5474. 10 February 1930. AcR. Compton, Esq., -Beverley 24, Balmain Road, Leich ardt. N.S. Dear Sir, 1 am writing up the narrative of the First Battle of Bullecourt for the Official History. Captain Gardiner happened to mention the other day that, in the middle of this scrap, you came to him with a ration of rum, which you insisted on his drinking. I had never heard the story before, and would be grate- ful if you would let me know how the rum got through and how it was distributed. I enclose a stamped and addressed envelope for your reply Yours faithfully, Official Historian.

the above. Can you kindly
put me on the track?
Yours very sincerely
T.A. White 

 

TELEPHONE:
CENTRAL 4780.
ADDRESS ALL COMMUNICATIONS
TO " THE SECRETARY"
No........
[*H/N
Bullecourt.*]
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE.
MELBOURNE.
[*Copied
6/2/24
AWB*]
March 14th 1923
My dear Bean
The document referred
to was shown me by one of the
14th Bn officer's who returned from
Germany after the armistice, I did
NOT see it at the War Office. It
was the intelligence summary
of the German Division opposing
us. which this fellow (Edmunds.)
had picked up in the dug out.
The Germans missed it in searching
him. It gave the names of
Brand, Dunaul, McSharry, Bockman 
and self. and an estimate of our
characteristics, based on reports
given by our prisoners (Australian)
The 4th Bde were given a very blood thirsty
"chit" in common with other Australian
troops and stated that it was the
constant policy of the Bde to kill
all prisoners except a few "Samples"
It then went on to say that the
capture of the undermentioned would


 

be rewarded by a money gratuity as
follows.
Brand 1500 marks
each C.O. 1000 marks
I hasten to add that the mark had
greater value then than now
I was going to get a copy of the
document but was busily engaged
on the now military employment
Section of Demobn at the time and
so missed the opportunity
It was quite apparent that the
Germans had copies of our Forces
lists. because the record of the
Permanent Officers was quite accurate
Will endeavour to get touch
with Edmunds (I feel certain it was he)
if you like, and ascertain if he has
the document still. Hope you
are keeping very fit.
Yours Sincerely
J H Peck 

 

13th BATTALION A. I. F.
REPORT ON OPERATIONS NEAR BULLECOURT, 11th April, 1917.
Reference Maps, 57c N W and 51b S W, 1/10,000.
(1) The Battalion was bivouaced at FAVREUIL and on the 8th April,
the C.O. made a personal reconnaissance of the ground with
Battalion Staff and Company Commanders.
(2) There was a conference of C.O.'s at Brigade Headquarters,
NOREUIL at 10.30 a.m. on 9-4-17 and at 12 midnight on night
10/11th April, 1917.
(3) On morning of 10th the Battalion was in readiness to attack
but owing to tanks being late this attack was cancelled.
(4) No written Battalion orders were issued but the C.O. had
several conferences with Company Commanders and officers, and
all understood their orders. These verbal orders were based
on 4th Aus. Inf. Brigade Order No. 76 of 10-4-17 issued at
6 p.m., and the continuation order of same date issued at
10.45 p.m.
(5) My plan was to have the battalion entrenched in Railway
cutting from C 5 d 2.8 to C 6 c 1.4. At 4.45 a.m. the
battalion was to move out in Artillery formation and follow
the 16th Battalion, and forming lines when the second objective
was crossed, they were to push on in the following formation
Diagram - see original document
and dig in as follows:-
"A" Coy. U 18 c 6.4.  to  U 24 b 0.6
"B" Coy. U 24 b 0.6  to  U 24 a 9.5
"C" Coy. U 24 a 9.5  to  U 24 c 6.8
"D" Coy U 24 c 6.8  to   U 24 c 4.0.
Four platoons, one per company, were to assist the tanks in
mopping up REINCOURT.
If the 16th Battalion met with serious opposition
in taking the Hindenburg line, the 13th Battalion was to
assist them, and then carry out their full orders as far as
possible.
Four Vickers Guns of No. 1 Section, 4th A.M.G. Coy.
under Lieut. Veness were attached to the battalion and were
allotted one to each company.
(6) At 3.35 a.m. the Battalion was in the railway cutting
ready to move out, and I had a final conference with the officers.

 

(2)
(7) At 4.45 a.m. punctually, "A" and "B" Companies moved out,
followed later by "C" and "D" Companys at distances of 200 yds.
As soon as they left the shelter of the cutting losses from
shell fire commenced. When about 600 yards from the 1st
objective the battalion came under heavy machine gun fire, which
became more intense at the first wire and officers and men fell
fast. The 16th Battalion had then taken the 1st objective
but were seen to be in very great difficulties with the 2nd
objective, the wire in front of which was uncut, and it was
only too evident that the 16th Battalion had suffered enormous
losses from machine gun fire in taking the 1st objective. The
Tanks had then not reached the first trench; there was a Tank in
the wire, and a German Machine gun only 10 yards from it, firing
heavily on our men. This gun was put out of action by our
leading Company (A). The 13th Battalion pressed on and with
the 16th, took the 2nd objective, mainly by bombing up the
communication trenches and then bombing to the right and left.
They soon established touch with the 14th Battalion on their
left; and by bombing extended their right flank to U 30 b 0.6
and U 30 a 9.4.
The machine gun fire rendered visual signalling impossible
and the open ground swept by machine gun fire was almost certain
death to runners, so that no messages were coming in to
Battalion Headquarters, but at 7.15 a.m. Captain Murray wrote
an account of the situation, which I received at 9 a.m. and
transmitted to Brigade Headquarters by runner.
About 7.20 a.m. a large amount of enemy movement was seen
around REINCOURT. Captain Murray sent up S.O.S. flares for an
artillery barrage but none was forthcoming.
At about 7.30 a.m. the Germans counter-attacked by bombing
down a communication trench from REINCOURT. This was beaten off
and a combined party of 13th and 16th bombers beat the enemy back
this trench to within 100 yards of REINCOURT putting in a block.
At the same time the enemy counter-attacked our right in the
2nd objective with bombs but were beaten back suffering heavy loss.
At 9 a.m. a battalion of the enemy in close formation
moving from QUEANT to the N. of REINCOURT was dispersed by our
machine gun fire, suffering heavy loss.
From then until 10.45 a.m. our men were re-organizing and
consolidating, during which time two small bombing attacks by the
Germans on our left were beaten off. All the bombs were
collected and dumps made near each bombing block.
Captain Murray went along the whole position and reports
that the 4th Brigade held 900 yards of the Hindenburg line. He
commenced the organization of the whole brigade position. At
10.45 a.m. heavy bomb attacks by the Germans were started from
the right and left of both objectives, also down the
communication trench from REINCOURT and a communication trench
running N and S on the W. of REINCOURT, six attacks in all.
These attacks were very severe and our bombs were
quickly exhausted, and our men pressed back to the centre of our
position from all sides. The Germans had machine guns trained
on the parapet which frustrated every endeavour on the part of
our men to go along the top and attack the bombers with the
bayonet.
Attempts to call up an Artillery barrage by power
buzzer and S.O.S. flares failed, the buzzer being jammed by the
Germans and the flares apparently not being observed.
Except where parties were cut off the men tried to get
back over the open under a fearful machine gun and rifle fire;
the losses being very heavy.
Shortly after noon the position was entirely evacuated.

 

(3)
(8) At nightfall, the remnants of the Battalion under cover of
the outposts of the 52nd Battalion, withdrew to NOREUIL and thence
to FAVREUIL.
(9) The failure of the Tanks was the primary cause of our failure
to carry out our original plan. They were knocked out by an
anti-tank gun situated on the W. side of REINCOURT, at a range of
about 600 yards. This gun was right in the open shooting
over open sights. No Tank reached the second objective, and
only one (perhaps two) crossed the first objective. Our men
put the anti-tank gun out of action with Machine gun fire from
the second objective, but by this time it was too late to save
the tanks. The fact that xxxx our artillery were slow in
putting a barrage on REINCOURT resulted in the bombing attacks being
pressed with great vigour; also the gap between the 4th and 12th
Brigades gave the Germans a great advantage. We did not have
enough had grenades or rifle grenades, but the role allotted
to the 13th Battalion was an above-ground one, hence we took
more S.A.A. and fewer bombs. Ground flares were lit at 8 a.m,
I cannot understand why the R.F.C. thought we were in REINCOURT.
(10) Our losses are as follows:-
                           Killed        Wounded       Missing      Total.
Officers                6                      6                      9                  21
Other ranks       19                    112                  358              489
__________________________________________________________
                           25                  118                367              510.
__________________________________________________________
JMA Durrant
Lieut-Colonel,
C.O., 13th Battalion, A.I.F.

 

5391.
22 January 1930.
Lieut.-Colonel H.W. Murray, V.C., C.M.G., D.S.O., D.C.M.,
Glenlyon,
Via Richmond. N. Q'Land.
Dear Murray,
I have been writing up the narrative of the First Battle
of Bullecourt. The records are fairly complete, but there are a few
points on which I should be grateful for your help, 1f you could give
it to me:-
(1) I remember your telling me that, on hearing of Black’s
death, you looked for him, but I think you said that you were
not sure whether you saw his body, though you were under the
impression that you did. I should be glad if you could give me
the benefit of your recollection on this point; also whether
this was before, after, or during your survey of the trenches.
(2) Some time before the final order to withdraw there was a
conference of a number of officers which decided, if necessary,
to leave the trench and hold on to a line of shell-holes. Can
you tell me what officers were at this conference, for
example, was Sommerville there? Aarons gave me most of the
names, which, as far as I know, included yourself, Gardiner,
Hummerston, Aarons, and Kerr. Was Sommerville or Fletcher
there?
(3) I have a note that all your platoon commanders and your
runner were wounded. I think this occurred before reaching
the trenches. Could you tell me 1f this was so, and what were
their names?
With kind regards,
Yours sincerely,
P.S. I think I remember your telling
me years ago that some photographs of
the Bullecourt fight were in existence.
Could you put me on to anyone who would
be likely to possess them?

 

Glenlyon,
Richmond,
N.Q.
12 3 30
Dear Captain Bean
I am enclosing replies
to your questions. Have forgotten quite a
lot, the replies are for your use publicly, this
is strictly private, & not in any way for publication
It was George Gardiner's first fight in France
his company. in fact B.C.& D Coys of the 13th had a
pretty good passage over, as the 16th supported by
A. coy of the 13th had for the time smashed
the German fire. It was absolutely impossible
to form any rear line of defence with the German
wire uncut, their absolute command of the position
& good visibility. & there were no shell holes
I saw only 3 on my return journey from the
German trench
Sorry I don't know of any photographs
of Bullecourt- there's quite a lot one could 
say, but it's better left unsaid, you would
have your own ideas of the veracity of the various
officers. Aarons left the trench long before the
general retreat, although long reports had gone
back to the 13th & 16th C.O's.
With kindest regard's
Yours Sincerely
H Murray

 

Glenlyon,
Richmond,
N.Q.
? (1) Black was killed between
the front & support line of
German trench after capturing
the front line & attacking
the support. I saw his body
within fifteen minutes of
his being hit. He was shot
through the head & as I
was assisting the 16th attack
on the support line I had
not time to even take his
personal effects.
? (2) I cannot remember the
names of the officers at the
trench conference. I never
seriously entertained the idea
of forming a line of shell-holes
or digging in behind the German
wire. First because there were
practically no shellholes, secondly
the Germans commanded
the position, with enfilade
oblique & frontal fire. I
estimated we would get only

 

Glenlyon,
Richmond,
N.Q.
(2)
10% of any party through the German
wire & these would not be
physically or mentally fit to
dig in or fight.
? (3) All my platoon commanders
were wounded in the attack
before reaching the German
trenches & my runner was
wounded in or near the
German wire. His name was
Stewart and a particularly
brave good lad. The only
platoon commander whose
name I can remember
was John Brown wounded
by machine gun fire fully
five hundred yards before
reaching the wire & afterwards
in early 1918 killed at
Neuve E'glise by a long range
shell.

 

FL.4151
5474.
10 February 1930.
A.R. Compton, Esq.,
"Beverley",
24, Balmain Road,
Leichhardt. N.S.W.
Dear Sir,
I am writing up the narrative of the First Battle of
Bullecourt for the Official History. Captain Gardiner happened
to mention the other day that, in the middle of this scrap, you
came to him with a ration of rum, which you insisted on his
drinking. I had never heard the story before, and would be grateful 
if you would let me know how the rum got through and how it
was distributed.
I enclose a stamped and addressed envelope for your reply.
Yours faithfully,
C E W Bean
Official Historian.

  
Last edited by:
Deb ParkinsonDeb Parkinson
Last edited on:

Last updated: